Charging capacity vs. charging speed: What constitutes high charging performance

** The collective fuel consumption values of all models named and available on the German market can be found in the list provided at the end of this MediaInfo.

Most charging processes of an electric car generally occur at home or at work. The time factor generally does not play a substantial role there. By contrast, every minute counts and fast charging is essential on a long-distance journey. After a brief break, the car should be ready for the next stage again. Therefore, many customers orient themselves toward the maximum charging capacity of their electric car to assess the charging characteristics – but this value is of only limited use if it concerns quick refueling of range at a fast charging terminal. High charging speed (kWh / minute recharged) over the entire charging process is essential for a short charging duration. In other words, a high charging capacity must be available for as long a period as possible. The e-tron models** with their continuous output impress with precisely this property.

Charging speed is more meaningful than pure charging capacity

In the current competitive environment, the Audi e-tron** takes the lead with a high-performance charging capacity even if there are already models on the market with a nominally higher output. The difference is in the details: The ability of the HPC fast charging (High Power Charging) to provide the highest possible output at the charging terminal may be a necessary prerequisite but it is not the one crucial factor.

A high current consumption on the part of the battery for a large portion of the charging procedure is, at the very least, just as important. However, if the car charges with maximum output over a relatively short period and needs to lower its power early, the charging speed is also simultaneously lowered – i.e. battery capacity recharged per unit of time. Thus, thanks to an ideal charging curve with maximum output available for a long period of time, the charging speed is the more substantial criterion when it comes to charging performance and, ultimately, it guarantees a short charging duration at the charging terminal. As well as the average consumption, it also depends on how much range can be recharged on average over a defined period, for example within ten minutes.

It’s the charging curve that makes the difference

When it comes to the charging curve, the Audi e-tron 55** plays to its conceptual advantages: The curve of an HPC terminal with 150 kW output stands out at a high level thanks to its continuity. Under ideal conditions the car charges between 5% and 70% state of charge at the threshold of the maximum output before the intelligent battery management reduces the current. A major difference from other concepts, which normally only reach their full output for a short time – at the “peak” – and lower their power considerably before reaching the 70% threshold. On a day-to-day basis, this means an elementary advantage: For a range of around 110 kilometers, the customer ideally spends just under 10 minutes at the charging terminal. The Audi e-tron 55** reaches the 80% mark after approximately 30 minutes. Even though it takes much longer, for technical reasons, to fill the remaining 20 percent of a lithium-ion battery, fully charging (5% to 100% state of charge) at an HPC terminal takes around 45 minutes – an outstanding characteristic in the competitive environment.

Thanks to sophisticated thermal management, the car charges more quickly

The lithium-ion battery of the Audi e-tron 55** has a gross capacity of 95 kWh (net 86.5 kWh) and has been designed for a long life cycle. Its elaborate thermal management system forms the basis for well-balanced performance and durability. Liquid cooling ensures that the battery’s temperature remains in the optimum range of 25 to 35 degrees Celsius, even at high stress levels or low temperatures. 22 liters of coolant circulates in the total of 40 meters of cooling lines in the four coolant circuits. During direct-current charging with 150 kW, cold coolant takes away the heat that occurs as a result of electrical internal resistance in the battery. The core of the cooling system is made up of extruded profiles – visually comparable with a slatted frame – which have been affixed to the battery system from below. A newly developed, thermally conductive adhesive joins the cooling unit to the battery housing. The gap filler forms the contact between the housing and the cell modules placed in it. This filler is a thermally conductive gel that fills the space to the housing beneath every cell module. The gel evenly transfers the waste heat produced by the cells to the coolant via the battery housing. The spatial separation of elements and battery cells carrying cooling water also increases the overall system’s safety. An additional positive side effect of this elaborate design is the high resilience in the event of a crash.

Fuel consumption of the models named above:
(Fuel consumption, CO₂ emission figures, and efficiency classes given in ranges depend on the selected equipment of the vehicle)

Audi e-tron 50 quattro
Combined electric power consumption in kWh/100 km: 26.6–22.4 (WLTP); 24.3–21.9 (NEDC);
Combined CO₂ emissions in g/km: 0

Audi e-tron 55 quattro
Combined electric power consumption in kWh/100 km: 26.4–22.4 (WLTP); 23.1–21.0 (NEDC)
Combined CO₂ emissions in g/km: 0

Audi e-tron Sportback 50 quattro
Combined electric power consumption in kWh/100 km: 26.3–21.6 (WLTP); 23.9–21.4 (NEDC);
Combined CO₂ emissions in g/km: 0

Audi e-tron Sportback 55 quattro
Combined electric power consumption in kWh/100 km: 26.0–21.9 (WLTP); 22.7–20.6 (NEDC);
Combined CO₂ emissions in g/km: 0